So...

...I don't get this. Because Uwe Boll can beat up his critics, does that somehow mean that his movies don't suck?

I don't see the logic. Can someone explain this to me? If George Lucas kicks my ass, does that mean that "Attack of the Clones" is well-written? If Michael Mann punches me in the nuts, does that mean that "Miami Vice" is a good film, instead of second-only-to-"Barb Wire" in the Worst Movie Ever category?

I mean, if it was that easy, then The Decider would send an Army guy to everyone's house and suddenly he'd be the best President ever. Not that I want to give Him ideas.